Home Alone
I'm an E.T. skeptic. The Fermi Paradox is the reason. The Fermi Paradox asks, reasonably, if intelligent life arises easily and often, then where is everybody? As old as the galaxy is, and considering the possibility of self-replicating Von Neumann probes, we shouldn't be able to swing a cat without hitting a Vulcan - or at least a robotic emissary.
The most likely answer attacks the premise of the paradox. Intelligent life (at least intelligent life that gives rise to interstellar civilizations) doesn't arise easily or often. We're alone. At least in this galaxy.
Some who have accepted this explanation of the Fermi Paradox have posited a depressing reason for E.T.'s absence - perhaps civilizations that reach our level of development tend to self-destruct.
But the great filter for interstellar civilizations doesn't have to be in front of us. There is a good argument that it is behind us.
[According to Professor Watson from the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia] Solar models predict that the brightness of the sun is increasing, while temperature models suggest that because of this the future life span of Earth will be ‘only’ about another billion years, a short time compared to the four billion years since life first appeared on the planet.“The Earth’s biosphere is now in its old age and this has implications for our understanding of the likelihood of complex life and intelligence arising on any given planet,” said Prof Watson.
“At present, Earth is the only example we have of a planet with life. If we learned the planet would be habitable for a set period and that we had evolved early in this period, then even with a sample of one, we’d suspect that evolution from simple to complex and intelligent life was quite likely to occur. By contrast, we now believe that we evolved late in the habitable period, and this suggests that our evolution is rather unlikely. In fact, the timing of events is consistent with it being very rare indeed.”
We're probably alone, but self destruction doesn't have to be our fate. If we can make it through the next century or so, we stand a fair chance of settling the galaxy.

Comments
It's not necessarily that intelligence takes a long time to develop relative to the lifespan of the biosphere, it's that life keeps being reset by these extinction events every few hundred million years. You need not just life, but accumulated complexity to survive. Given a few more million years, the dinosaurs might have made it.
Posted by: Phil Bowermaster
|
April 17, 2008 05:30 PM
Yep!
Posted by: Stephen Gordon
|
April 17, 2008 07:45 PM
Yes, the Kroffts were way ahead of their time. Which makes me wonder what kind of evolutionary dead-end this guy was supposed to represent.
Posted by: Phil Bowermaster
|
April 18, 2008 08:03 AM
Snort!
Posted by: Stephen Gordon
|
April 18, 2008 08:43 AM
The stability of the star system is a very big deal in the arrival of intelligent life. As you suggested, complexity is the key and complexity requires stress... within tight limits.
As the earth shattering asteroids diminished (the gas giants get a lot of credit) it allowed more and more time between the major extinction events. Enough time (this last time) for intelligent life to arise.
But the taming of the solar system took a lot of time.
Were we to go extinct, there might not be time for another shot at intelligent life in this solar system before the sun becomes too unstable.
Posted by: Stephen Gordon
|
April 18, 2008 08:54 AM
Another thing to consider is that intelligent self-reproducing life is extremely dangerous. As I see it, a galactic civilization would have several long term solutions. Either destroy it, modify it so it's no longer dangerous, or allow it to evolve "naturally" to become a contributing member of your civilization. The last might require a long hands-off period and is certainly the riskiest of the bunch. Much like the "prime directive" of Star Trek.
Posted by: Karl Hallowell
|
April 19, 2008 01:26 PM
But!!
The "Drake Formula" starts with a sample of one, and says- "nah- we're alone."
that seems big somehow.
Posted by: MDarling
|
April 20, 2008 07:51 PM
And HR Puffnstuff?
FIts how??
Posted by: MDarling
|
April 20, 2008 07:55 PM