The Speculist: Cleaning up Space

logo.jpg

Live to see it.


« Friday Video -- a Poetry Reading | Main | FastForward Radio -- From Sub-Human to Post-Human in Three Easy Steps! »


Cleaning up Space

Bob Cringely proposes launching a space garbage scow to clean up the 18,000 pieces of space junk that have collected in Earth orbit.

Cringely thinks that a single garbage scow could clean up all of it - provided no more junk is added - in four decades. Because time to completion is important (and we will continue to add junk), two or three of these robo-collectors would be a good idea.

I'm afraid that, like adding gates at a dangerous rail crossing or a control light at an intersection, this might be the sort of project that gets launched only after a disaster. That would be a shame. Orbital space junk is so obviously dangerous that being proactive with this problem seems like a no-brainer.

Especially if we are predicting a near future with more humans in space.


UPDATE:

I agree with Cringely that the problem is important and needs attention. I disagree with his proposed solution. Instead of moving a very heavy vehicle around trying to intercept each individual piece of debris, why not use a shotgun approach? We should engineer tiny spacebots that can be programmed to intercept junk, and then push it into the atmosphere.

The downside, of course, is that you are literally put more stuff out into space. The best failsafe - if the bot misses its intended target, it throws itself into the atmosphere.

Comments

Is the junk really that - junk? Or is it "junk" in terms of being comprised of items that were placed into orbit that are no longer able to perform their initial duties?

Is this junk really so value-less that pushing it into the atmosphere (for what I presume to be disintegration during re-entry) is the best solution? Is collecting the junk a more expensive proposition than retrieving it and returning it to Earth for recycling and/or repurposing?

If I remember my RAH young adult novels correctly, having the scow vessel travelling in a higher orbit means it travels faster then the majority of the junk it's to collect. If that's so then Cringely's purse-seine net idea is actually much more economical then a 'bot device for each object such as you suggest Stephen (except for the largest items). I do wonder if tossing it all back into the atmosphere to burn up is the best option though. We (somebody) already spent oddles getting the stuff into orbit in the first place, isn't there some better on orbit use this material could be put to once it has been secured? Seems a pity to literally waste the lift investment each item represents. Since the suggested scow design appears to be tele-operated from the planetary surface, why couldn't it (scow and recovered material together) be ultimately transferred to a higher orbit still and used as an on orbit general hardware resource that periodically makes a multi-orbital pass to "re-stock" from the remaining stray assets clogging up NEO regions?

Presenting Nanotech Scrubbing Bubbles: They work hard at keeping space sparkling clean so astronauts won't have to.

I fail to see why a bot that missed an intended target would throw itself into the atmosphere.

Apparently the idea is that the bot would ram the target and send it into the atmosphere like a billiard ball.

I visualize it more like this:

The bot approaches from behind and snares the target in a net. Then it adjusts course slightly and goes after another piece of debris.

At some point, depending upon the mass collected, the bot and debris could reentr the atmosphere over the Pacific.

But bots are going to be expensive, so probably they should detach only the net and contents and send that down to its doom.

Bots could visit a space station for refueling and refitting or wait to be visited by astronauts to do that.

Going after multiple targets may be tricky because these are in wildly different orbits. The best case are pieces from a single launch because they're going to be on reasonably close trajectories but the longer they've been up there the greater the dispersion due to tidal forces. You are not going to collect garbage in polar orbit in the same mission as a geosyncronous pickup.

Depending on the size and location some junk may not need to be physically intercepted. Turn a 100MW laser on a 1 kg piece of scrap metal and no one will notice the resulting cloud of plasma even if they run straight into it. Some Larger bits can be "nudged" into the atmosphere by judicious application of laser fire from high orbit. Some is just going to have to be manually collected and dealt with directly.

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated, and sometimes they take a while to appear. Thanks for waiting.)






Be a Speculist

Share your thoughts on the future with more than

70,000

Speculist readers. Write to us at:

speculist1@yahoo.com

(More details here.)



Blogroll



Categories

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2