I was born into a world in which no individual or group claimed to own the mission embodied in the Lifeboat Foundation's two-word motto. Government agencies, charitable organizations, universities, hospitals, religious institutions -- all might have laid claim to some peace of the puzzle. But safeguarding humanity? That was out of everyone's scope. It would have been a plausible motto only for comic-book organizations such as the Justice League or the Guardians of the Universe.

Take the United Nations, conceived in the midst of the Second World War and brought into its own after the war's conclusion. The UN Charter states that United Nations exists:

• to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and


• to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and


• to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and


• to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom

It is both exciting and daunting to live in an age in which a group like the Lifeboat Foundation can exist outside of the realm of fantasy. It's exciting because our awareness of possibility is so much greater than it was even a generation or two ago. And it is daunting for exactly the same reason. We can envision plausible triumphs for humanity that really do transcend our wildest dreams, or at least our most glorious fantasies as articulated a few decades ago. Likewise, that worst of all possible outcomes -- the sudden and utter disappearance of our civilization, or of our species, or of life itself -- now presents itself as the end result of not just one possible calamity, but of many.

I've spent the last few years writing about many of those plausible triumphs, while paying less attention to the possible calamities. But I'm not sure that this is a clear-cut dichotomy. Pursuing the former may ultimately provide us with the tools and resources we will need to contend with the latter. So my own personal motto becomes something of a double-edged sword. I encourage everyone to strive to "live to see it." But maybe we also need to figure out how we can see it...to live.

With that in mind, perhaps "safeguarding humanity" takes on a double meaning, too. We must find a way for humanity to survive in the face of these very real threats. Moreover, we must find a way for humanity -- the values, the accomplishments, the sense of purpose which has defined the entire human experience -- to survive. And that may be the most audacious mission statement of all.

Stephen and I will be interviewing the Lifeboat Foundation's International Spokesperson Philippe Van Nedervelde on the next FastForward Radio.

(Cross-posted to the Lifeboat Foundation blog.)