iFly Swarms
Keitousama predicts a world full of flying cameras that he cleverly calls iFly's. Some would be owned by individuals, others would be used publicly like webcams.
He seems excited about this, but I have to wonder whether any privacy would be possible in a world where everyone is a iFly on the wall.
-Linkathon.
Yes, the Speculist Linkathon continues. If you'd like get linked by The Speculist, email us.

Comments
I tend to look at it from David Brin's transparency point of view. Privacy's pretty much dead, and the only way to avoid some kind of police state scenario is for everyone to have access to the surveillance tools, instead of just the authorities. People would have to become a lot less judgmental about what others do in public, too.
Posted by: MattShultz
|
September 5, 2007 12:46 PM
Matt:
An offense is the only defense.
I hope it doesn't come to this, but you could be right.
Posted by: Stephen Gordon
|
September 5, 2007 05:56 PM
If we have EMP countermeasures to eliminate the invasion threat, does it really help anyone? Those with the most to hide will have the (probably expensive) defenses, and the rest of us will be powerless to escape the ever watchful eye of ... everyone or anyone or no one, but it won't matter because we would never know. Privacy is dead? Is that because it has been bred out of us? Are we just so complacent that we no longer demand our rights?
Posted by: MikeD
|
September 5, 2007 10:18 PM