Remodeling El Jef, week 1
Goaded Irritated Inspired by Phil's year-long success on the weight-loss front (see here for the first and the most recent entries chronicling his progress), and not wanting my nickname to be changed from El Jefe to El Hefty, I've decided to embark on a program of my own to both reduce my overall weight, and to improve the measured composition of what remains.
(Please see the extended entry for progress to this point and other information.)
I've chosen a few personality parameters around which to shape my program:
- Unsurprisingly, given my association with this blog, I am far more motivated by numbers and the gadgetry involved in collecting them than other means of experiencing the process (such as how I look in the mirror or how I am feeling).
- I live rock-throwing distance* from a city-parks-department-provided, state-of-the-art, fitness center. It has about two-dozen stack- or plate- loaded weight lifting machines (again the gadget factor), costs me about 25 - 30% less than comparable or lesser private health clubs in membership dues, and is even directly on at least two of my paths home from work.
- Finally, for now, before and beyond the fact that I am a Speculist and a gearhead, I am a foodie. This means that the ' diet' portion of this exercise will consist of reducing portion sizes and shifting my food choices toward whole grains, minimally-processed fruits and vegetables, and lean meats. (The 'exercise' portion of this diet will consist of controlled and machine-guided weight lifting to raise my overall abysmal activity level and maintain whatever level of muscle mass I've managed to hang on to, combined with low-level cardio activities calibrated to put my system in the 'fat-burning' zone.)
All of these choices have been made to maximize the probability that I can continue the process long enough to achieve the ultimate goal and minimize the possibility that I will fall back to old ways when, or if, my primary and secondary goals are achieved.
PROGRESS REPORT: Good News and Bad News
The Good News -
In the week ending Friday, January 26th, 2007, my body weight has decreased 3.2 pounds from my starting weight of 231.8. While this is about half of Phil's first week progress**, it is 33% higher than my target at this point. In future installments of this series I will explain the means and reasons I've used to set these weekly goals, for now it is sufficient to know that I'm meeting or exceeding them.
The Bad News -
Over the same period measures of my body composition, as quantified by Percent Body Fat (%BF) and Percent Skeletal Muscle (%SM) and enumerated by daily use of the Omron HBF-500***, have both been going the opposite directions from those intended. %BF is up 0.5% and %SM is down 0.3%, implying I've gained 1.8 pounds of body fat and lost 0.7 pounds of skeletal muscle and 2.5 pounds of 'other' in the week between Friday the 19th and Friday the 26th.
EVALUATION:
I'm on target to make my goal, but there are some disturbing implications to the information so far. I haven't been at this long enough to determine the degree to which my measurements could be influenced by variables such as hydration, exercise frequency, and metabolic and hormonal fluctuation, among others, so I'm going to stick to my plan for a while and see how things develop.
Next time, more on the tools I've chosen to assist me in this process and some additional insight into my goals and how I've chosen to set them.
NOTES:
* In the interest of truth in blogging, the fitness center is not, actually, within the range to which I could throw a rock of any size. According to Google Earth it is 913.5 feet from my bedroom as the crow flies, 1,364.56 feet from my back door by the most direct footpath, and a quarter mile or so away from my garage by car. Unless I want to drop the cost of an Italian supercar on outfitting my basement, this is the next-closest big pile of top-quality body-modification machines I have access to.
**This is ABSOLUTELY THE LAST direct comparison readers will find in these entries between my path and Phil's. We are different people, using different means to achieve broadly similar goals of physical and psychological modification. I make the comparison at this point only to introduce the subject of my goals and the means by which I have chosen to set them.
***I'll get more in depth in my discussion of the gadgetry involved in this process in future entries. For know it might enlighten the reader to know that the Omron HBF-500 'Body Composition Monitor' is a scale with electrode patches for inductively estimating Body Fat Percentage, Skeletal Muscle Percentage, relative level of Visceral Fat (fat around the internal organs as opposed to sub-cutaneous fat, and calculates Body Mass Index and Resting Metabolic Rate in food calories.
Comments
Be aware that fat loss is not a linear process. My suspicion is that the omron, measuring your body conductivity, is reacting to a water loss as a loss of muscle.
Also, I suggest a third measure, and that is the usual tailor measurements.
Be aware that these will not change in a linear fashion either, or at the same time as your other data sources.
In fact, tailor measurements do some pretty interesting things. As one goes from more spherical (El Jef isn't starting out that big, so this may not apply), to more cylindrical, there's a period where one's measurements change ridiculously rapidly, since weight loss is more or less a volumetric loss, and the more you lose, the higher order force in the equation your height constant becomes.
As far as weight lifting goes, start out gentle. The old "no pain, no gain" thing is nonsense, and once you're over about 25, the pain *lingers* more.
-Jim
Posted by: Jim Strickland
|
January 27, 2007 04:50 PM
Thanks for the inputs, Jim. All of these are points I'm working on writing up for next week, but, for the sake of the teaser:
1) Linearity: this is a big part of next weeks entry. Suffice to say, my plan is significantly NON-linear.
2) Water loss v. Muscle loss v. Fat loss. I don't yet have sufficient information or field data to make a judgement as to how hydration and other factors influence the Omron's figures. There is an interesting blip in the numbers that may be significant in that regard, though.
3) Tailor measurements. Not currently being taken (other than pants waist) but planned for monthly.
4) After injuring myself early on the last three out of three times I've tried a deliberate exercise plan, you can bet I'm taking things very gradually this time. Besides, the weights element of my current planned program is much more an ego-based attempt to 'keep what little I've got' than a serious influence on the major goal , which is getting down to a healthier weight.
-Mike.
Posted by: Michael S. Sargent
|
January 27, 2007 05:39 PM
Here's one thing I've figured out -- water loss, fat loss, whatever -- when you need new pants, you're heading in the right direction.
Vaya con Dios, Jefe!
Posted by: Phil Bowermaster
|
January 28, 2007 12:57 PM