Cornerstone for Lunar Colonization and Commercial Development
As late as the early 21st century there has yet to be found a compelling reason to go to and maintain a continuous human enterprise on the Moon. This discussion presents a potentially novel, lofty and commercially interesting initial rationale for lunar development.
An often overlooked asset of the Moon is its unique environmental conditions. Low G is well known, but less often considered is its potential for free and continuous extreme cold.
There are a few dozen craters at the lunar poles where the sun NEVER shines. A cryonics station can be constructed in one or several of these craters. To what end? To build an Ark to cryogenically preserve Earth's biosphere and to serve as the cornerstone of lunar commercialization.
Cornerstone would be the "Noah's Ark" of Earth's biosphere an off planet " Ark" to ensure cryonic preservation of all of earth's living species - automated to detect ELE (extinction level event) with automated systems to start the countdown to send the ark back to Earth – and deploy and animate/activate its payload. The Cornerstone installation and the Ark would be constructed robotically/teleoperatively. The Cornerstone project and its Ark would be marketed as the backup of the geobiome...i.e. "COOP Earth" or COPE (COntinuity Of Planet Earth) to various international and US budget influencers such as the green community, politirk to cryogenically preserve Earth's biosphere and to serve as the cornerstone of lunar commercialization.
Key points:
Free - uninterrupted - unending cold at < 90 degrees Kelvin
Zero melting risk from power outage
Mountain sized solar wind/radiation blocker for 360 degrees of horizon
Solar panels can be erected around the perimeter of the crater for perpetual energy in situ
Lunar water at the poles can be thawed and catalyzed to produce hydrogen and oxygen – propulsion and electricity, materials etc.
1/6th Gravity avoids tissue drift and mechanical stresses on equipment for near geologic periods of time
Ark could operate reliably without human intervention for centuries
Absence of oxygen eliminates tendency for oxygen to become enriched in liquid nitrogen, (concern has been expressed that high concentrations of liquid oxygen -- way, way more than in the atmosphere, since liquid is 1000 times denser than air and the % of liquid oxygen could be higher than the % of oxygen in air, might react with biological samples over extended periods of time
No need for expensive and unreliable dewars
No issues from weather, rust, mold and mildew, insects, bacteria, etc
Low gravity environment eases relaunch of the whole package if and after there has been some decades of terrestrial silence (ELE happened)
When combined with Helium 3 mining, these just might be sufficient to get us there and finally make Heinlein rest easy. http://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/000193.html
Comments
Neat idea.
Sounds like the basis for a neat variation on the 2001: A Space Odyssey story.
Instead of an alien civilization intervening in the rise of a civilization, the "monolith" is a space ark - the surviving mechanism of a doomed advanced civilization reseeding the planet it destroyed.
Posted by: Stephen Gordon
|
January 26, 2007 10:06 AM
Ben -
{Rod Serling voice}
Imagine if you will...
{/RSV}
What if a previous sentient species (Tyranosaurus sapiens) had created such an ark with a 'deadman' switch consisting of code along the following lines:
(Translation: If you receive the "Still here" radio message periodically, do nothing, if not, begin the launch sequence.)
One could envision a successor species, (e.g. us), ignorant of the communication protocol and message encoding scheme, or even the existance of the 'Ark', being very surprised by the delivery of an entire prior ecosystem.
If the biosphere had recovered from whatever extinction event had eliminated the prior sentient species, the successor species might find themselves being out-competed by (or at least in direct competition with) the prior inhabitants.
In a particulary pessimistic version of the scenario, some minor species in the prior biome proves directly pathogenic to the successor sapient species. Something like a reverse of what happened to the Triceratops in "Jurassic Park".
Posted by: Michael S. Sargent
|
January 26, 2007 10:58 AM
It seems to me that a better money making scheme would be use the same locations for cryogenically storing humans. There's certainly some financial interest in that area and the people paying for it wouldn't have to worry about the company going out of business and failing to refill the dewars.
I guess, though, it depends on what kind of time frame most cryo-customers are looking at. If they expect to be revived in a relatively short time then the added expense and difficulty of being stored on the moon wouldn't be worth it. But if they are looking at 50+ years, then the added stability of the environment might be worth it.
Posted by: AndrewS
|
January 26, 2007 11:16 AM
Andrew --
Greg Bear wrote a short story a few years back about craters on the moon being used for that very purpose. Of course, you can't very well have all those frozen dead people up there without figuring out some creepy way to have them start coming back to life. Bear delivered, with an added wrinkle that one of the "corpsicles" was a frozen science fiction writer who also founded an odball, cult-like religion. I'm not saying who that was supposed to be, but if they ever make a movie out of Bear's story, I bet Tom Cruise won't be in it!
Posted by: Phil Bowermaster
|
January 27, 2007 06:16 AM
So if somebody tells you to put something where the Sun don't shine...
Posted by: Joseph Hertzlinger
|
January 27, 2007 08:06 PM