Speaking of Energy Production
Well, I was...yesterday, but you kind of have to dig for it.
Those who insist that a hydrogen-based energy economy is impractical and undoable have a lot of recent news to contend with. It looks like we'll either find a way to do it at the molecular level or using good old atom-splitting technology.
I'm fine either way.
Comments
Wouldn't it be great if all the problems associated with hydrogen production and transportation could be solved with a water spliting molecule?
"Fill 'er up with water, and I'm a quart low on Spliter."
Posted by: Stephen Gordon![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.blog.speculist.com/nav-commenters.gif) |
                                 December  7, 2004 03:44 PM
 |
                                 December  7, 2004 03:44 PM
                              
If one considers using a nuke plant to power a hydrogen factory just to avoid burning hydrocarbons, why not just use the nuke plant to replace hydrocarbon burning electrical plants. Burn all the saved hydrocarbons in vehicles where there already is a distribution network.
Posted by: SteveW![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.blog.speculist.com/nav-commenters.gif) |
                                 December  7, 2004 06:45 PM
 |
                                 December  7, 2004 06:45 PM
                              
There are so many alternate routes to alternate energy that I remain skeptical of any one proposal until it's actually in production.
But, that said? I no longer fear that we'll never find a workable alternative to fossil fuels.
Posted by: Dean Esmay![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.blog.speculist.com/nav-commenters.gif) |
                                 December  7, 2004 11:01 PM
 |
                                 December  7, 2004 11:01 PM
                              
With the Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative not set to go to an engineering demonstration until 2016 (!), I think we're likely to see solar hydrogen first. There are just so many ways for solar to succeed, from engineered chlorophyll-based systems to the ruthenium-rhodium complex to plain old green algae to systems based on activated titanium dioxide. They can be developed in small labs and brought to production so much more cheaply, and the political and legal issues associated with nuclear are entirely absent.
Lovely hydrogen
So many ways to make it
Confusing choices
Posted by: Engineer-Poet![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.blog.speculist.com/nav-commenters.gif) |
                                 December  8, 2004 08:49 PM
 |
                                 December  8, 2004 08:49 PM
                              
Lovely hydrogen
So many ways to make it
Heh. I think you can't actually "make" hydrogen without some sort of fusion. I think you mean "use it."
I know, I know, I'm being a nit-picky geek. ;-)
Posted by: Dean Esmay![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.blog.speculist.com/nav-commenters.gif) |
                                 December  9, 2004 03:47 AM
 |
                                 December  9, 2004 03:47 AM
                              
Geeky Dean Esmay
Likes to pick on ev'ry nit
Gets teased with haiku
Posted by: Engineer-Poet![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.blog.speculist.com/nav-commenters.gif) |
                                 December  9, 2004 07:33 AM
 |
                                 December  9, 2004 07:33 AM
                              
(make that "Gets teased with silly haiku".)
Posted by: Engineer-Poet![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.blog.speculist.com/nav-commenters.gif) |
                                 December  9, 2004 04:29 PM
 |
                                 December  9, 2004 04:29 PM