9/11
Below are my reflections on September 11 from last year, slightly revised. It occurs to me on rereading this essay that there are probably some who would find the dreaded "hubris" in our assertion that the world is getting better all the time. Thinking back on the horror of that day, the optimistic worldview, even that of the serious optimist, seems hard to defend.
Has the world become a better place since September 11, 2001? That, after all, is the position that the optimist would be called on to defend. But I'm not sure the question is for us to answer. I would leave it to those in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And even if they tell us that the world has gotten no better, that there is still strife and violence and uncertainty, that they continue to be victims of powers who care nothing about them, I would only say this (as I did in response to the Iraqi soccer coach who complained that his country is "still occupied" and "not free"): these people certainly seem to enjoy their freedom of speech. I wonder how long they've had it?
This weblog is dedicated to the idea that the future is open; it is something that we can create together. I've written recently about the kinds of changes that can occur that serve as signposts dividing the past from the present, or the present from the future. In the face of those kinds of changes, it often seems that we have no choice, no say in what might happen next. Here's an image that will always haunt me, something that occurred in the final hours of the previous era.
It was September 9, 2001.
My wife and I were wrapping up our weekend in Manhattan. We had done a little shopping, eaten some good food, seen a few sights. We were on the Statue of Liberty tour boat heading back towards Battery Park. The World Trade Center loomed before us.
It's too bad, I observed, that we didn't make time to visit the observation deck on top of one of the towers. On a clear day like this, the view would be spectacular.
Maybe next time, my wife said. We had already discussed coming back with my daughter to do more sightseeing.
Sure, I said. After all, it's not like those towers are going anywhere. If those bastards couldn't take them down with their car bomb, I doubt anything will ever take them down.
I'm not sure why I said it. Earlier that day, we had walked past a small exhibit commemorating the bombing and its victims. I guess it was on my mind.
Two days later, I was working at home in Denver. I went downstairs to pour myself a second cup of coffee and decided (against any kind of precedent) to turn on the TV and see what the headlines were. There were the towers the invincible towers of recent memory now seen from a different angle, with thick, black smoke billowing out of each.
They would only be standing a short while longer.
Maybe there was no way to foresee the horrible events of that day (although others did.) But I had something to learn about making facile statements to the effect that things will work out, as well as arrogant assumptions that things will not change.
The future is open. It is something we can create together. We must continue to try to do so, with our hopes as high as ever. And our eyes wide open.
But wait. If we take such a simplistic approach, don't we then run the risk of engaging in hubris? Wasn't it hubris, after all, that lead us to build those towers in the first place? I think not. I may have been guilty of hubris in the poorly considered statements I made on the ferry. But there was no overbearing pride or presumption inherent in building the World Trade Center. The people who went to work there that day were not guilty of arrogance. Nobody had it coming to them. The events of that day did not reflect divine justice handed down from Mt. Olympus; they were the acts of psychotic murderous fanatics.
The World Trade Center was a glorious achievement. I hope that it's replacement proves to be just as glorious. Those who build it, like those who endeavor to achieve any great thing, will need to temper their ambition with caution against the harm that nature or evil men can do. But they must not, and we must not, temper our ambitions out of false humility or the fear of retribution from some deity so small and petty that he feels threatened by the works of humanity.
If anything, I think God laments the fact that, all too often, our thinking isn't nearly big enough.
Comments
Phil:
I've often heard arguments particularly from the left about excessive American hubris. Even Bush ran in 2000 on a platform of a "more humble foreign policy." And the announced purpose of French foreign policy is to "counter American hegemony." Now John Kerry is arguing that we've squandered the good will of the world after 9/11.
I wander at what point, exactly, this "good will" was squandered. Many point to the war in Iraq, but I would place it earlier. The "good will" was gone after we went to Afghanistan. The "good will" of France (and other like-minded nations) requires a humbled, defeated, and victimized America. Once we responded, we ceased being victims and lost their "good will."
In other words, the "good will" was not solidarity, it was pity with maybe even a touch of sadism. There was an agreement that it was a shame that innocents suffered and died, but that it was the direct result of an unenlightened U.S. foreign policy. If the U.S. learned her lesson, then maybe the victims would not have died in vain.
What have we lost by squandering that "good will?" For a country that has not accepted defeat and surrender, it was worthless to begin with.
One reason for my optimism that "things are getting better all the time" is that few people who are ever set free are ever satisfied with less than freedom. The Iraqi athletes can badmouth America if they like, but the fact remains that they aren't being tortured by Uday anymore. Even those ingrates wouldn't want to go back.
Posted by: Stephen Gordon
|
September 13, 2004 08:56 AM